user:kluong:low_power_design_considerations

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

user:kluong:low_power_design_considerations [2020/04/28 03:23]
kluong [Table]
user:kluong:low_power_design_considerations [2021/09/19 21:59]
Line 1: Line 1:
-Currently a draft: 
  
-**Low power design considerations** 
- 
-  * Previous designs are pretty inefficient - lets take a look at why (the design choices are different for each hardware platform) 
-    * Apple 
-    * Cranberry 
-    * Dragonfruit 
-    * Guava? 
-  * The assumption from before: we needed to either run things at 3.3v or 5v. Turns out we could run things at 2.8v - if we take a look at all of the modules, the one with the highest minimum voltage is the XBee at 2.8v. The atmega328p can technically run at a lower voltage. 
-  * Need to figure out this situation: if we run the mcu at 2.8v, can we still use the regular usb-serial converter? I think the logic lines will be fine. 
-  * XBee power states (sleep mode) 
-  * Microcontroller sleep modes 
-  * Other sensors 
-  * How low can we go? 
- 
- 
-Links: 
- 
-  * http://​www.home-automation-community.com/​arduino-low-power-how-to-run-atmega328p-for-a-year-on-coin-cell-battery/​ 
-  * https://​lowpowerlab.com/​shop/​index.php?​_route_=Moteino/​moteino-r4 
-  * https://​www.rocketscream.com/​blog/​product/​mini-ultra-8-mhz-arduino-compatible/​ 
- 
- 
-^ test                                                                                        ^ test                                                               ^ 
-| Car Insurance\\ Electricity\\ Adobe\\ Maya\\ Spotify\\ Linkedin asdasd asdasd ad asd asd a  | Testing testing testing testing testing\\ Testing testing testing ​ | 
  • user/kluong/low_power_design_considerations.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/09/19 21:59
  • (external edit)