wind_sensor:meeting_minutes_mar_10_2017:meeting_minutes_mar_3_2017

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision Both sides next revision
wind_sensor:meeting_minutes_mar_10_2017:meeting_minutes_mar_3_2017 [2017/03/11 01:22]
mwu created
wind_sensor:meeting_minutes_mar_10_2017:meeting_minutes_mar_3_2017 [2017/03/11 03:01]
mwu
Line 11: Line 11:
     * Further ran tests with the ultrasonic transducers using a function generator and oscilloscope. We found out that we don't actually need a sine wave to drive the transducers,​ and that a square wave would work as well. This is good news since square waves are much easier to produce than sine waves.     * Further ran tests with the ultrasonic transducers using a function generator and oscilloscope. We found out that we don't actually need a sine wave to drive the transducers,​ and that a square wave would work as well. This is good news since square waves are much easier to produce than sine waves.
     * Tested transmitter with 3.3Vpp, 40kHz square wave. Result is 400mVpp sine wave. This isn't bad, (much better result than previously),​ but we would need an amplifier circuit to increase this signal.     * Tested transmitter with 3.3Vpp, 40kHz square wave. Result is 400mVpp sine wave. This isn't bad, (much better result than previously),​ but we would need an amplifier circuit to increase this signal.
-    * Ordered ​more parts as backup.+    * Ran some more tests with the Tee
   * To Do:   * To Do:
     *     *
  • wind_sensor/meeting_minutes_mar_10_2017/meeting_minutes_mar_3_2017.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/09/19 21:59
  • (external edit)