x96_syllabus:teamwork

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

x96_syllabus:teamwork [2016/05/08 03:42]
kluong
x96_syllabus:teamwork [2021/09/19 21:59]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Teamwork ====== 
- 
-===== Team Evaluations ===== 
- 
-The following ratings will be used to evaluate team members. Evaluations will not be shared with any members outside the leadership team.  
- 
-Also, provide comments in your submission giving the reasons for your ratings and a description of how the teamwork is going in your team. 
- 
- 
-^ Rating ​    ^ Description ​ ^ 
-| Excellent ​     | Consistently did more work and took on more team responsibilities than they were assigned, tutored/​mentored teammates, always well prepared and cooperative | 
-| Very Good      | Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative | 
-| Satisfactory ​  | Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative | 
-| Average ​       | Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative | 
-| Marginal ​      | Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared | 
-| Deficient ​     | Often failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared | 
-| Unsatisfactory | Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments,​ unprepared | 
-| Superficial ​   | Practically no participation | 
-| No Show        | No participation at all | 
- 
-This evaluation table is taken from Tep Dobry'​s website: http://​www-ee.eng.hawaii.edu/​~tep/​EE160/​S10/​eval.html 
- 
- 
- 
-===== Sample Evaluations ===== 
- 
-<​code>​ 
- 
-Zachary Dorman - Very Good 
-Christie Obatake - Excellent 
-Kenny Luong - Very Good 
-Bob Russ - No Show 
- 
-Bob Russ didn't show up during the entire semester. In fact, 
-no one knows about him since he didn't show up at all.  
- 
-</​code>​ 
  
  • x96_syllabus/teamwork.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/09/19 21:59
  • (external edit)