x96_syllabus:teamwork

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
x96_syllabus:teamwork [2016/05/06 01:28]
cobatake created
x96_syllabus:teamwork [2021/09/19 21:59] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Teamwork ====== ====== Teamwork ======
  
 +Teamwork is an essential part of the Smart Campus Energy Lab.
 ===== Team Evaluations ===== ===== Team Evaluations =====
 +
 +The following ratings will be used to evaluate team members. Evaluations will not be shared with any members outside the leadership team. 
 +
 +
 +**Guidelines**
 +
 +  - Provide comments in your submission giving the reasons for your ratings and a description of how the teamwork is going in your team.
 +  - Excellent ratings are to be given sparingly - your evaluations shouldn'​t normally consist of ALL excellent evaluations.
 +
 +
 ^ Rating ​    ^ Description ​ ^ ^ Rating ​    ^ Description ​ ^
-| Excellent ​     | Consistently ​went above and beyond, tutored teammates, ​routinely went above and beyond the basic team responsibilities. ​+| Excellent ​     | Consistently ​did more work and took on more team responsibilities than they were assigned, tutored/​mentored ​teammates, ​always well prepared ​and cooperative ​
-| Very Good      | Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative+| Very Good      | Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative | 
-| Satisfactory ​  | Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative+| Satisfactory ​  | Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative | 
-Ordinary ​      | Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative+Average ​       ​| Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative | 
-| Marginal ​      | Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared+| Marginal ​      | Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared | 
-| Deficient ​     | Often failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared+| Deficient ​     | Often failed to show up or complete assignments,​ rarely prepared | 
-| Unsatisfactory | Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments,​ unprepared+| Unsatisfactory | Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments,​ unprepared | 
-| Superficial ​   | Practically no participation.+| Superficial ​   | Practically no participation | 
-| No Show        | No participation at all.  ​|+| No Show        | No participation at all | 
 + 
 +This evaluation table is taken from Tep Dobry'​s website: http://​www-ee.eng.hawaii.edu/​~tep/​EE160/​S10/​eval.html 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Sample Evaluation ===== 
 + 
 +<​code>​ 
 + 
 +Zachary Dorman - Very Good 
 +Christie Obatake - Excellent 
 +Kenny Luong - Very Good 
 +Bob Russ - No Show 
 + 
 +Bob Russ didn't show up during the entire semester. 
 + 
 +Besides that the team has been working well together. We sometimes 
 +find it hard to meet since our schedules dont line up with each other 
 +but everyone pitches in and it feels like we're one cohesive group  
 +working towards something. 
 + 
 +Christie has been instrumental in helping the other members of the team  
 +as well as those from other teams, often staying late to help people  
 +with things that they'​re having trouble with.  
 + 
 +</​code>​
  
  • x96_syllabus/teamwork.1462498082.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/09/19 21:59
  • (external edit)