This is an old revision of the document!
Teamwork
Team Evaluations
The following ratings will be used to evaluate team members. Evaluations will not be shared with any members outside the leadership team.
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| Excellent | Consistently did more work and took on more team responsibilities than they were assigned, tutored/mentored teammates, always well prepared and cooperative |
| Very Good | Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative |
| Satisfactory | Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative |
| Average | Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative |
| Marginal | Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared |
| Deficient | Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared |
| Unsatisfactory | Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, unprepared |
| Superficial | Practically no participation |
| No Show | No participation at all |
This evaluation table is taken from Tep Dobry's website: http://www-ee.eng.hawaii.edu/~tep/EE160/S10/eval.html
Sample Evaluations
Zachary Dorman - Very Good Christie Obatake - Excellent Kenny Luong - Very Good Bob Russ - No Show Bob Russ didn't show up during the entire semester. In fact, no one knows about him since he didn't show up at all.